One can only imagine the astonishment and glee with which Russia’s leaders are observing Nancy Pelosi’s nearly hysterical determination to prevent the United States from developing its own oil resources, and the fecklessness of Democratic Presidential nominee B. Hussein Obama in the face of their aggression against an American ally.
B. Hussein Obama is too arrogant to change. As self-anointed lecturer-in-chief and secular American messiah, it’s he and only he, don’t you know, that knows THE answer?
That said, the reason, I believe, that Obama and his camp are paralyzed by these current controversies is that they expected the mainstream media in the U.S. to continue its journalistic malfeasance and give him the free ride he got for months.
For all its purported savvy, team Obama appears to never have contemplated it would actually have to answer questions relating to who Obama is or pre-tends to be–questions about his character, associations, judgment, politics, elitism, inexperience, ignorance of economics and international affairs, left-ism, disdain for unborn life, inherent racism and bitterness and fatigued po-litical solutions.
As for the suggestion that he start bashing oil companies about high prices: Why not? According to his Philadelphia lecture, it’s not just non-black peo-ple, but especially white people–actually "typical white people" on which he’s expert–that are the source of bitterness and more in the black commu-nity, but it’s those corporations who dare get involved in capitalism.
Perhaps while he’s bashing, though, the junior senator from Illinois might turn the mirror on himself and the rest of Congress, especially those career-ists in it–and especially those in his own political party–and ask: Why is there no coherent energy policy in the U.S.? Why is it, as fuel rich as it is, a net importer now of not just oil but natural gas? Why has partisanship and coziness with special-interest so-called environmentalists been preferred over freedom from energy slavery?
As for something new in his campaign, how about this: B. Hussein Obama actu-ally explains who he is, what he stands for and why, and what he means by "change"?
Almost forgot: How it is that his legislative record, especially the U.S. Sen-ate, shows essentially no bipartisanship, but that of consistent liberal/leftist voting and betrayal of agreements he has made across the aisle.
Respectfully, given his remarks after the Pennsylvania primary, that chal-lenges to his character as well as political and cultural mind-sets are mere distractions and should be off limits, I think he’s too narcissistic–and, frankly, too woefully unaware–to grasp how truly out of sync he is with most Americans.
He is and remains a counterfeit. And no amount of window dressing or tweaking now will undo that. Not even replacement of his political glass jaw will help, either.
B. Hussein Obama remains opposed to new offshore drilling (although he now says he would accept a highly restricted version as part of a comprehensive package). Just last week, he claimed that if only Americans would inflate their tires properly and get regular tune-ups, "we could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling."
This is bizarre. By any reasonable calculation of annual tire-inflation and tune-up savings, the Outer Continental Shelf holds nearly a hundred times as much oil. As for oil shale, also under federal moratorium, after a thousand years of driving with Obama-inflated tires and Obama-tuned engines, we would still have saved only one-fifth the oil shale available in the United States.
God Bless America
Are you mental? How many times can you ask this stupid question?
One more thing … 2 points!
December 1st, 2009 at 7:15 am
Are you mental? How many times can you ask this stupid question?
One more thing … 2 points!
References :